Is television a form of entertainment or information? Discuss your views.
Recently, the phenomenon of the TV set and its corresponding impact has a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of watching television as an entertainment device is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that using the TV as a form of information can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, an extensive range of information program in TV can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of raising public awareness in terms of economic or medical field, as well as, beneficial programs are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of entertainment programs on the young generation. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both sports events as an amusement program and films or series apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of information and entertainments programs, TV set might increase the consequences of promoting cognitive skills. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the wrong news would relate to this reality that the demerits of time-consuming device pertain to eye vision problem. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of watching television is correlated negatively with obesity. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of keeping up with the latest news.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of information program in television outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of educational programs prove the significance of documentary program, but also pinpoint practical implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54266211604 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31777831871 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62457337884 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7668670112 50.4703680194 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.333333333 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140031065868 0.242375264174 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465134430448 0.0925447433944 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465961836462 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0833051114028 0.151781067708 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033141153596 0.0609392437508 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.59 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.