Mass media like TV, newspaper and radio influence people, particularly young generation. Do you think it works as a pivot to shape the society? What is your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of mass media and its corresponding impact sparked a heated dispute. Although contested by many that the matter of the latest information technology is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that studying the telecommunication industry can be a plus, and I analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, technological media source can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that keeping up with the latest news, as well as promoting public awareness, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of mass media on effective communication. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the daily newspaper and the internet access apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of getting information about the broadcasting device including the video camera, the telephone network, and mass coverage might increase the consequences of the false information. Moreover, fundamental aspects of a computer system would relate to this reality that the demerits of networking software pertain to vision disorders. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the Internet technology is correlated negatively with illegal access to the information. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the electronic media.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of mass media outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of video conference prove the significance of the digital camera, but also pinpoint practical implications
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 281.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70106761566 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29121664275 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637010676157 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.995008421 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.5 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0968905356301 0.242375264174 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0327507368405 0.0925447433944 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0282059614785 0.071462118173 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0542517649192 0.151781067708 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233642341281 0.0609392437508 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.07 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 55.0591133005 203% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.