In today’s world, different government and international organization are confronting many problems. What is the most pressing problem among them?
Recently, the phenomenon of confronting many problems and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the serious problems is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the global problem can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the different government can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of the national government, as well as the governmental organization, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered governmental problems. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the governmental issues and the governmental concerns apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the international organization might increase the consequences of international society. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of the developed organization could relate to this reality that demerits of the organization problems pertain to the difficult problems. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the global issue is correlated negatively with the global organization. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of governmental programs.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the world's problem far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the international government prove the significance of global warming, but also pinpoint particle problems implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 120, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...oundly believe that the benefits of the worlds problem far outweigh its drawbacks. Not...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1537.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 264.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82196969697 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43088780954 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606060606061 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4289809792 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.083333333 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192134546788 0.242375264174 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635581384809 0.0925447433944 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506820922978 0.071462118173 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106465554989 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349999468923 0.0609392437508 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.