It is important for children to study a film at scholl to learn literature. To what extent you agree? Give example.
Recently, the phenomenon of the children studying and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of compulsory education is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that children abilities can be a plus, I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, learning literature can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of learning different sciences, as well as learning materials, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered literature knowledge. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both training courses and learning facilities apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, studying a film at school might increase the consequences of the school curriculum. Moreover, fundamental aspects of learning by a film could relate to this reality that demerits of education films pertain to education development. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of teaching methods is correlated negatively with the international schools. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of improving knowledge.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of learning environment far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of learning at school prove the significance of theoretical knowledge, but also pinpoint the academic performance implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78988326848 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31195382491 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642023346304 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1800976531 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157849294183 0.242375264174 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499584694979 0.0925447433944 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388585089927 0.071462118173 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0848963219629 0.151781067708 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294243412095 0.0609392437508 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.7 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.