In town and cities, the large shopping mall should replace the small shop. Do you agree or disagree?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in now its 21st century every people shop in big malls. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in one’s life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain in this essay.
There are number of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant on is that every type of things provide in shopping malls can not only contribute to shopping under one roof and discount &offers on branded products, but also lead to numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to the wide range of advantages it offers, not only can one benefits more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives, with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits stand one in good stead, as far augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
There are, however, some pitfalls that can easily overwhelm the potential benefits of snatching bread and butter of local retailers. The primary one steam from the fact that by observing the aforementioned trend, people have not only realized its gravity, but also gauged the magnitude of its repercussions when it comes to today’s ever-changing lifestyles. Besides, its impact on shopkeeper’s life is far- reaching indeed. Hence, it is apparent why many are against large shopping malls, malls every product is original.
In view of the arguments above, one can conclude that despite some drawbacks, the benefits of shopping malls is good but small shop is perfect choice for poor people are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-25 | Jaskaransingh11 | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | Jaskaransingh11 | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | manraj123 | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | Navjotkaur56 | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | manraj123 | 55 | view |
- more information available online 77
- environmental pollution 77
- Networking of public transportation available for eveyone 77
- A good listener is better than a good talker in a social situation Do you agree or disagree 69
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communication, such as letters, email, or telephone calls. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stance. The most preponderant on is that every type of things provide in shopping...
^^
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...type of things provide in shopping malls can not only contribute to shopping unde...
^^^^
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...one roof and discount &offers on branded products, but also lead to numerous othe...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ople are indeed too great to ignore.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1417.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02482269504 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79041739782 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58865248227 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.0144840381 50.4703680194 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.083333333 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.25397266985 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141502157825 0.242375264174 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509941465873 0.0925447433944 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710946497375 0.071462118173 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0971619762368 0.151781067708 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494352206396 0.0609392437508 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 12.6369458128 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.