Some people think technology helps us save time but others believe wastes our time.
The importance of technology helps us save time but other believe wastes our time which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while other reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate both positive and negative effects of this trend and thus will lead to logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that technology is best option for human life and time saving product. For example, smart phone is very common in my nation and many people use this mobile phone. Needless to say all these merits stand in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negative these arguments and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming one is that childrens many time spend in smartphone this not good habbits, and not constercate in study.
To conclusion, according to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of think technology helps us save time are instrument indeed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... other believe wastes our time which was always debatable has now become more con...
^^
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aiming that it is beneficial while other reject this notion. The substantial infl...
^^
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the best'.
Suggestion: is the best
...one stems from the fact that technology is best option for human life and time saving p...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 187, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'many times'.
Suggestion: many times
...the most alarming one is that childrens many time spend in smartphone this not good habbi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, thus, while, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1110.0 1207.87684729 92% => OK
No of words: 215.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16279069767 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64808470843 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 139.433497537 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595348837209 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 379.143842365 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.1296866784 50.4703680194 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.333333333 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31317228871 0.242375264174 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111200241553 0.0925447433944 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15774139414 0.071462118173 221% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183760038347 0.151781067708 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0927034027318 0.0609392437508 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 71.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.