In town and cities, the large shopping malls should replace the small local shops
In this day and age, the phenomenon of replacing shopping malls in cities and its corresponding effect has sparked heated controversy. Although contested by many that the mater of unemployed workers is highly profitable, such an issue is regarded both constructive and positive thoroughly by a considerable number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that glamorous buildings can be a good point, and I will analyze it throughout this essay.
Initially, from a social viewpoint, small local shops can supply the society with some conspicuous impacts which are rooted in the fact that tourist attractions, as well as time-consuming purchases, are integrally bound up. According to my own experience when I was a university student, I carried out an academic experiment that detected traditional shops. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both homegrown products and being cost-effective can be seen.
Secondly, within the realm of science, large shopping malls might escalate the consequences of metropolises' amenities. Furthermore, fundamental aspects of well-designed shops could correlate with this reality that the demerits of sophisticated businesses are associated with costly structures. To shed light on this point, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university has asserted that the downside of modern shops is negatively related to ongoing development. Hence, it is true to assume the preconceived notion of replacing traditional shops.
To make a long story short, while there are several convincing arguments on both sides, I deeply believe the benefits of local shops outnumber its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of frustrated customers prove the significance of efficient trades, but also pinpoint more accessible shops implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 265.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69056603774 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30624187183 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 139.433497537 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679245283019 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.648717928 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.666666667 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246623715578 0.242375264174 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782116709195 0.0925447433944 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704085777211 0.071462118173 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132243784364 0.151781067708 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441441433551 0.0609392437508 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.92 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.