Travel to study is overrated, we have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really required for higher studies?

Essay topics:

Travel to study is overrated, we have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really required for higher studies?

The importance of study in abroad which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of study in abroad is better than the local studies has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational this essay will further elaborate both positive and negative effects of this trends and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.

There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stem from the fact that the travel to study is overrated has more beneficial for students because they do work with their study period. For instance, students are working in the abroad in different kind of work like work in restaurants, malls, driving so on in the period of study visa. Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that the colleges provide the best scholarships to the brilliant students.

However, there are some pitfalls that negate this argument and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of study in abroad but the most alarming one is that if students are studying in the abroad else the economy of their home country can be diminished. For example, students pay their fees of study in abroad from home country then the economy of native country decreased. Hence, it is apparent, why many are against this notion.

According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach a conclusion that the benefits of study in abroad are instrumental indeed, however its potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 478, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e both positive and negative effects of this trends and thus will lead to a logical ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, look, so, then, thus, while, for example, for instance, kind of, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12274368231 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65885395603 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541516245487 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 443.7 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.0451548366 50.4703680194 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.9 104.977214359 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7 20.9669160288 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3 7.25397266985 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2113288076 0.242375264174 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891192787656 0.0925447433944 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642710105992 0.071462118173 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129423082117 0.151781067708 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442878631705 0.0609392437508 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.1260098522 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.