In underdeveloped countries tourism has disadvantage and can be said that opposite as well. What’s your view?
The substantial influence of tourism has sparked the controversy over recent years. These days, there is an ongoing debate between people about tourism in the least developed countries has pros as well as cons. This essay will elaborate on both sides of the arguments and I will share my opinion at the end.
At the outset, there are myriads of reasons why tourism could be beneficial, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that develop nation’s economy. As an illustration, we have so many Island countries revenues are majorly dependent on tourism. In addition, it is easy for people to setup a startup companies as tourism's are less capital business. Therefore, tourism has significant advantage in under developed countries.
Nevertheless, some people adopt an opposing view and tend to believe that tourism could be detrimental to countries as there are innumerable reasons for that, but the most predominant one lies in the fact that cultural damage. In fact, culture of the country could be spoiled because of various level of people visit. Furthermore, the tourism has the potential impacts to do collateral damage in countries culture. Because of this, tourism in non-developed lands has huge impact.
In summary, the foregoing discuss propounds the view that sightseeing in under developed regions could be advantage or disadvantage. In my opinion, I would strongly recommend that tourism industries should be encouraged in any country due to various aspects of financial benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: CAN_SETUP[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to set up'?
Suggestion: to set up
...ism. In addition, it is easy for people to setup a startup companies as tourisms are les...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, as to, in addition, in fact, in summary, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1277.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 240.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32083333333 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92930298403 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604166666667 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1465462517 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2307692308 104.977214359 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4615384615 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 7.25397266985 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225600209619 0.242375264174 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801486528169 0.0925447433944 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354936166644 0.071462118173 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13832922603 0.151781067708 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250513335254 0.0609392437508 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.