In underdeveloped countries, tourism has disadvantages and it can be said the opposite as well. Discuss.
The importance of underdeveloped countries which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject f this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. This essay will further elaborate my view from favoring both side positive and negative of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most important one stems for fact is that governments earn the foreign exchange and also it create employment opportunities for the Peoples. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that we known about different cultural and also they learn our cultural. Moreover, attracts investment and develops infrastructure. Needless to say, that all these merits stand in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that the negate these arguments and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but the most alarming one is that tourists come with the expensive items and so chances of theft rise and also there are increase crime rate. Hence, it is apparent why are many against of this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach a conclusion that the benefits of underdeveloped countries are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, its potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'creates'?
Suggestion: creates
...s earn the foreign exchange and also it create employment opportunities for the People...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... However, there are some pitfalls that the negate these arguments and which can certainly...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 31.9359605911 66% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1236.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 229.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39737991266 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90741164385 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633187772926 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.4307431847 50.4703680194 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.363636364 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0502756730612 0.242375264174 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0203385879314 0.0925447433944 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0312449211416 0.071462118173 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0408179809927 0.151781067708 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454447312824 0.0609392437508 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 12.6369458128 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.