What are the advantages and disadvantages of living in era where new things are constantly being invented?

Essay topics:

What are the advantages and disadvantages of living in era where new things are constantly being invented?

The importance of new things which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject of this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my view from favoring both side positive and negative effects of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.

There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most important one stems for fact is that its save the time and make the work easy & comfortable. Moreover, we can do any work with the helps of machines in less time. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that we can work without any other people help. Needless to say, that all these merits stand in a good stead.

However, there are some pitfalls that the negate which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but the most alarming is that the people are totally dependent on machines and its is not good for our health. Hence, it is apparent why are many in against of this trend.

According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of new things are instruments indeed. Nevertheless, its potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 206, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...omfortable. Moreover, we can do any work with the helps of machines in less time....
^^
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... However, there are some pitfalls that the negate which can certainly overwhelm the poten...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun in seems to be countable; consider using: 'many ins'.
Suggestion: many ins
...r health. Hence, it is apparent why are many in against of this trend. According to t...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, while, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1167.0 1207.87684729 97% => OK
No of words: 235.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96595744681 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64603292358 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 139.433497537 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587234042553 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 379.143842365 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8160446955 50.4703680194 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.25 104.977214359 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5833333333 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0541895191927 0.242375264174 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0231551021536 0.0925447433944 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337946020777 0.071462118173 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0415697668939 0.151781067708 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461297831122 0.0609392437508 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.1260098522 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.5310837438 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.