Violence portrayed on TV and in the movies leads to an increases in crime in our society. People who watch violent movies are more likely to become criminals. Do you agree or disagree?
Television in the present world has become an integral part of our daily life. It plays a vital role in providing us valuable information, knowledge, and news from all over the world. However in recent days, increased explicit content and the violence portrayed on TV and movies has resulted in people becoming more violent and more likely to become criminals. I completely agree with the above statement and this will be discussed using a pragmatic approach.
To commence with, increasing crime scenes and movies on television impacts the young audiences in an adverse manner. Actors and celebrities undertaking the crime, aggressive and brutal scenes in various movies act as a role model for the young audiences. As a result of this, the young audience imitates them resulting in serious consequences including serious crimes, murders, offences, illegal matters and activities. For instance, a research conducted by Mass Media Authority in Australia reveals that more than 75 percent of the audiences are influenced by the actions on the TV and tries to undertake the same at some point in their life.
On the other hand, some people believe that these violent movies and crimes displayed on the television can have positive results if perceived in a positive manner. If the audiences get the right message or is made aware of the consequences such as life-imprisonment, death penalties, they will get a positive message and will refrain themselves from getting into such activities again.
To put it in a nutshell, it can be concluded that despite having few positive impacts, he negative impacts of the violent scenes cannot be ignored. Therefore, the positive use of television should be promoted, however, its excessive and misuse should be condemned.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...edge, and news from all over the world. However in recent days, increased explicit cont...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an adverse manner" with adverb for "adverse"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... television impacts the young audiences in an adverse manner. Actors and celebrities undertaking the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 144, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive manner" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... can have positive results if perceived in a positive manner. If the audiences get the right message...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, therefore, for instance, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22535211268 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86828141682 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605633802817 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4134614228 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.666666667 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229381699168 0.242375264174 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847477610146 0.0925447433944 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118836359422 0.071462118173 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128500233689 0.151781067708 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111541931827 0.0609392437508 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.