In a war of ideas, it is people who get killed”. Does a common man suffer from a group’s ideology? Express your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of in a war of ideas, it is people who get killed and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that a group’s ideology can be a plus, and I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, a war of ideas can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of critical issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered vocational education. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, a group’s ideology might increase the consequences of critical needs. Moreover, fundamental aspects of practical learning could relate to this reality that the demerits of a laboratory experiment pertain to the intellectual development. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of in a war of ideas, it is people who get killed far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint social implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-02 | Hari Sharma | 61 | view |
| 2018-07-25 | dhavalpatel095 | 85 | view |
| 2018-07-25 | dhavalpatel095 | 77 | view |
- Should digital media replace textbooks? what are the reviews and possible solutions. 88
- Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree. 88
- should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner to improve the networks of public transport? agree or disagree 85
- Personal development is the base for professional development and advancing in one’s career. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- extreme sports 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 279.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58422939068 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36824512431 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616487455197 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3567863038 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.833333333 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.25397266985 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197800599157 0.242375264174 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639282231686 0.0925447433944 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0800948156571 0.071462118173 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112181747234 0.151781067708 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607758275078 0.0609392437508 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.78 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.