“In a war of ideas, it is people who get killed’: Does a common man suffer from a group’s ideology? Express your opinion, and support the same with reasons and examples.
In this day and age, the phenomenon of T1 and its corresponding effect has sparked heated controversy. Although contested by many that the matter of N1 is highly profitable, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a considerable number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that N2 can be a good point, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
Initially, from a social viewpoint, T2 can supply the society with some conspicuous impacts which are rooted in the fact that advantages of N3, as well as N4, are integrally bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I carried out an academic experiment that detected N5. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both N6 and N7 apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, T3 might escalate the consequences of N8. Besides, fundamental facets of N9 could correlate with this reality that the demerits of N10 are associated with N11.to shed light on this point, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university has asserted that the downside N12 is related negatively to N13. Hence, it is true that to assume the preconceived notion of N14.
To make a long story short, while there are several convincing arguments on both sides, I deeply believe that the benefits of T4 outnumber its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of N15 prove the magnitude of N16, but also pinpoint N17 implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-13 | Alireza.r.68 | 11 | view |
- experience is more effective way to teach, compared to books. 88
- Some people argue that young people should concentrate on study or work, some people think it is better to put energy in activities designed to broaden their experience, such as international travel and volunteering. Support with examples or cases. 85
- Working employees have paid leaves Is it good or bad 70
- Some people point that experiential learning (i.e. learning by doing it) can work well in formal education. However, others think a traditional form of teaching is the best. Do you think experiential learning can work well in high schools or colleges? 85
- Do you think English will remain to be a global language despite globalization? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, besides, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1205.0 1207.87684729 100% => OK
No of words: 239.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04184100418 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.048547165 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.682008368201 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 379.143842365 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6770925222 50.4703680194 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.545454545 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7272727273 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0257495377253 0.242375264174 11% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00652224058603 0.0925447433944 7% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0139650253685 0.071462118173 20% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0132811464949 0.151781067708 9% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0132813746159 0.0609392437508 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.1260098522 110% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.5310837438 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.