What are the different methods students using to achieve information? Online materials, asking teachers or discussing with classmates?
Recently, the phenomenon of students using different methods and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of student’s methods is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that educational methods can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, achieving information can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of information technology, as well as web-based materials, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I discovered online information. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both class discussion and teacher’s role apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, online materials might increase the consequences of methods of achieving information. Moreover, fundamental aspects of methods of achieving online materials relate to this reality that the demerits of online methods pertain to educational information. As a tangible example, some scientific experiments undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of educational technology is correlated negatively with teaching materials. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of teacher’s methods.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of discussing with class far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of teaching information technology prove the significance of asking teachers, but also pinpoint web-based information implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-24 | yasamin.gharib62 | 80 | view |
| 2018-10-04 | sadegh shahsavand | 88 | view |
| 2018-09-29 | Arash3agle | 85 | view |
| 2018-07-07 | minapolo | 88 | view |
- do you agree that doctors and teachers should be paid more than others? 88
- do you agree that universities should provide so much theoretical knowledge or give more practical training throughout their courses? 80
- Do you that with online information library books are useless? 85
- do you agree that the government should reduce their investment in arts, music, and painting? 77
- People emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities Do you agree or disagree 69
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 251.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.99601593625 5.00649968141 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4491777331 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621513944223 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3749804382 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.416666667 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356522002241 0.242375264174 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102295323384 0.0925447433944 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478089986187 0.071462118173 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177098651049 0.151781067708 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366492685392 0.0609392437508 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.52 11.5310837438 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.67 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.5123152709 171% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.