What is the best invention of last 100 years, the computer, antibiotics, the airplane, and explain why?
Recently, the phenomenon of the most useful invention of the century and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the computer invention is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that travelling by aeroplane and antibiotics effects can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, computer aid work can provide the society with some noticeable effects which rooted in the fact that the merits of creative thinking, as well as great ideas, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the intriguing results of antibiotics use and the computer helpful invention. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both digital innovative and salient facts of antibiotics apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, aeroplane crash might increase the consequence of passenger’s injuries or death. Moreover, fundamental aspects of new-brand technology addiction would relate to this reality that the demerits of the vehicle-dependent lifestyle pertain to increasing air pollution rate. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of inappropriate fly services is correlated negatively with uncomfortable travel. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of unpleasant seats.
To conclude, while there are compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of computer and antibiotics far weigh its drawbacks. Not only do advantages of easy and healthy lifestyle prove the significance of high-level sanitation, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74100719424 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37200622203 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 139.433497537 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661870503597 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9301473409 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0190800050547 0.242375264174 8% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00670585963571 0.0925447433944 7% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0150803172998 0.071462118173 21% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0113878525735 0.151781067708 8% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0197243392465 0.0609392437508 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.74 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.