The idea of some people thinks foreign visitors should be charged more than local people when they visit the cultural-historical attractions in the country is widely debated, with many people claiming that the benefits it offers are no match for its drawbacks. However, I do not entirely accept this, and I will explain why in this essay.
There are a number of argument in front of my stance. One of the most conspicuous aspects of charging more to foreign visitors in comparison to local people when they visit the cultural and historical attractions in a country is that it will increasingly float more foreign investments. Not only they will spend more to visit such cultural and historical attractions, but they will spend more on our cultural food and wearings. Needless to say, all these merits as mentioned above with stand subject in good stead, when it comes to foreign visitors investments on once culture.
However, there are some pitfalls that can easily overwhelm the potential benefits of the charging more from the foreign visitors on their visit to cultural and historical attractions in a country. The primary one lies in the fact that it may decrease the foreign visitors. Besides, that less visitor may lead to low investment of foreign currency in a country. Hence, it is apparent why many are against the charging more from the foreign visitors.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that despite some drawbacks, the benefits of the topic are indeed too great to ignore that the foreign visitors should charge more on their visit to cultural and historical attractions in a country.
- Completing university education is thought by some to be the best way to get a good job. On the other hand other people think that getting experience and developing soft skills is more important.Discuss both side and give your opinion? 72
- Extreme sports like skiing, rafting, diving should be banned. Agree or disagree? 55
- Some people believe laws change human behavior. Do you agree with it? 88
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon. 88
- Some people say law can change human behaviour. Do you agree? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, may, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1365.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01838235294 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73908408766 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 139.433497537 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481617647059 0.580463131201 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.0 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.1293263479 50.4703680194 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.090909091 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7272727273 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36363636364 7.25397266985 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230794369153 0.242375264174 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854002151371 0.0925447433944 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776044637129 0.071462118173 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158307177174 0.151781067708 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731984086225 0.0609392437508 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.32886699507 94% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 55.0591133005 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.