When you look for a job, some people think salary is more important while others think work condition is more important. Which one do you agree with?
Recently the phenomenon of looking for a job and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of acceptable salaries are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that energetic work's conditions can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, finding a suitable job can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of important factors, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of well-paid jobs. Hence, beneficial ramifications of brilliant conditions are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, a poorly-paid job can supply the community with negative impacts, which are related to the reality that demerits of inefficient working are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described dismal work's conditions. Thus, predicted outcomes of an insufficient salary are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of looking for a job far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of sufficient salaries prove the significance of an excellent work condition, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1268.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 225.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63555555556 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27969887205 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9057969779 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.272727273 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4545454545 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 7.25397266985 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187622167309 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615108169943 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0272023481367 0.071462118173 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104281111301 0.151781067708 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0152960915862 0.0609392437508 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.16 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 55.0591133005 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.