Travelling to study is over-rated. We have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really necessary for tertiary studies?
Recently, the phenomenon of traveling to study and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of over-rated travels are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that brilliant scholars can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, traveling abroad to study can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of sophisticated scholars, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of efficient tertiary studies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of an over-rated expedition are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, studying locally can supply the community with negative impacts, which are related to the reality that demerits of local scholars are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described inefficient travels. Hence, predicted outcomes of dismal tertiary studies are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of traveling to study far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of brilliant scholars prove the significance of necessary tertiary studies, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-18 | ghazal123 | 85 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
| 2019-11-20 | bradkina | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | bradkina | 72 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | mndpsngh21 | 77 | view |
- Do you think English will remain to be a global language despite globalization? 88
- “In a war of ideas, it is people who get killed’: Does a common man suffer from a group’s ideology? Express your opinion, and support the same with reasons and examples. 11
- Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of differential education, i.e., splitting students into different classes according to their academic performance. 88
- The time people devote in job leaves very little time for personal life. How widespread is the problem? What problem will this shortage of time cause? 80
- experience is more effective way to teach, compared to books. 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1279.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 221.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78733031674 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22869624357 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660633484163 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6605993303 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.272727273 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0909090909 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299180003945 0.242375264174 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986168385604 0.0925447433944 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615445510152 0.071462118173 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169834772312 0.151781067708 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345647803047 0.0609392437508 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.34 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.