Whether design of building with have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work?
Whether design of building with have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work?
Architectural works, in the material form of buildings are perceived by general public as cultural symbols and as works of art. Essentially, social and cultural products are incentivized and influenced by values, ideas, relationships and social organizations that they stimulate. In this essay, I shall in agreement discus that architecture has a positive impact on social and cultural development of humans.
Firstly, architectural designs are products of people, secondly whether they have a positive or negative impact has been a great debate for every one. There are many reasons suggesting that buildings have positive influence of peoples lives. One main reason may be that individuals are living in modern era, close to large cities and centers. In addition, the construction and architecture helps individuals organize work, resources and provide space.
Although, society works in close areas, problems seem to be diminishing as buildings are being constructed high in the sky. Therefore, the impact of buildings can be largely seen as innovative in peoples lives. Research suggests, that people are moving closer and closer to one another. As a result, architecture needs to be well organized in order not to create negative impact on one another. The general public does not have misunderstandings on advantages that buildings offer them.
In conclusion, alternative pathways have been created for infrastructure, architecture and construction of such buildings. Lightweight materials are helping architects design new structures, in order to fit more people. In the future, we shall have positive outcomes; as such spaces are empowering people positively in their lives. Advantages overcome disadvantages, new technologies are influencing excellent residential construction, extending individuals wellbeing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-09 | Anonymous | 77 | view |
| 2018-09-09 | Anonymous | 77 | view |
| 2018-09-09 | Anonymous | 77 | view |
| 2018-05-05 | belinapupa | 77 | view |
| 2018-05-05 | belinapupa | 77 | view |
- Problems and benefits for high school students study plays and works of theatres written centuries ago. Discuss and use your own experience. 61
- Parents should be held responsible for children's acts. What is your opinion? 77
- Medical technology is responsible for the human s life expectancy To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- How widely do you think the problem spreads that people spend to much time on work than their personal life and experience time shortage? What problems will it cause? 77
- Parents should be held responsible for children's acts. What is your opinion? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...rial form of buildings are perceived by general public as cultural symbols and as works of art...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 400, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ate negative impact on one another. The general public does not have misunderstandings on adva...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78169014085 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24502732512 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556338028169 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.7578685604 50.4703680194 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.5882352941 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7058823529 20.9669160288 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05882352941 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413133265615 0.242375264174 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141893760038 0.0925447433944 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.208869053469 0.071462118173 292% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.324037111024 0.151781067708 213% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.304687417356 0.0609392437508 500% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 53.1260098522 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 55.0591133005 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.