The idea of being born as a superb leader is rejected by those who believe that leadership skills are learnable. I agree with the latter opinion and these views will be discussed in the following essay.
On the one hand, it is claimed that many people congenitally have an ability to lead groups better than others without any learning. Taking Hitler as an example of a big leader, we can clearly justify such a claim as his leadership dexterity was not applied by any leaders in history. Moreover, investigating the history, kings could rule countries conquered without any modern doctrine taught.
Nevertheless, I would argue that humans can learn anything especially leadership and management. For instance, learning management leadership skills in universities like the major of Master of Business Administration or any leading skills, people can learn anything related to their business. Another argument in favor of this idea is people can learn employees' emotions that can affect being a superb leader such as knowing the consequences of shouting at employees which can influence their work can be taught in some leadership courses. Learning leadership from experienced experts, people can benefit more than acting by themselves. As a result, the possibility of such skills in routine life is extremely high and depends on one's growth in environmental conditions.
To conclude, while it is true that some leadership qualities are likely to be inherited, I strongly believe that being a leader could be learned through training for the reasons mentioned above.
- As computers translate quickly and accurately learning foreign languages is a waste of time To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think human behaviors can be limited by laws others think laws have little effect What is your opinion 78
- Many people think that some individuals are naturally good leader Others think that people can learn leadership skills Discuss both views 73
- Some people feel that it is always wrong to keep animals in captivity for instance in zoos Other people say that there are benefits for the animals and for humans Discuss both sides of this debate and give your personal view 77
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do Deforestation pollution global warming Government increase taxes improve public transport renewabl 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, however, if, may, so, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.204778157 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8704309405 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57337883959 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.3013633034 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.928571429 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232944405267 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751809039763 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620790794968 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114865529493 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704817181621 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.