Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of the impact of experimental learning and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the formal education is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the effectiveness of experimental can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, acquiring knowledge by experimental learning can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of promoting the cognitive skills, as well as intellectual ability, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of experimental learning in social and professional life. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both transferring the experience to others and having a devoted effort apparently can be seen.
From a realm of educational science, formal and informal education might increase the consequences of giving a sense of motivation. Moreover, fundamental aspects of abundant talent could relate to this reality that the demerits of learning sedentary pertain to practical experience. as a tangible example, some academic research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the experimental learning is correlated negatively with learning arduously. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of beneficial educational experience.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the experimental learning far outweigh its drawback. Not only do the advantages of expanding your horizon prove the significance of promoting the performance, but also pinpoint practical implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...entary pertain to practical experience. as a tangible example, some academic resea...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81205673759 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39329833908 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599290780142 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9543523859 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.583333333 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211310548742 0.242375264174 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660578422792 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435097192078 0.071462118173 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114757352321 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331539711473 0.0609392437508 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 12.6369458128 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 53.1260098522 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.54 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.