Speaking topics in text
TPO 16 - Question 4
Social Loafing
When people work in groups to perform a task, individual group members may feel less motivated to contribute, since no one person is held directly responsible for completing the task. The result is that people may not work as hard, or accomplish as much, as they would if they were working alone and their individual output were being measured. This decrease in personal effort, especially on a simple group task, is known as social loafing. While it is not a deliberate behavior, the consequence of social loafing is less personal efficiency when working in groups than when working on one's own.
Speaking recording
Votes
This speaking topic by users
| Post dates | Users | rates | Contents |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-12 | pashmina hira | 50.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2019-12-27 | Bobby1987 | 66.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2016-08-28 | mgrajapt | Check this speaking | |
| 2018-09-06 | mgrajapt | 66.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2017-04-24 | mgrajapt | 80.00 | Check this speaking |
Speaking category
Speakings by user Bobby1987
:
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students benefit more from classes with a large number of students than they do from smaller classes. Use specific examples and details to support your opinion. 83
- TPO 20 - Question 3Energy costs reach sky-high levelsHeating prices, and the university’s heating bills, reached record-high level this year. In an effort to reduce heating costs, the university decides to lower the temperature in classroom buildings on 83
- TPO 12 Question 3 College Radio Station to Undergo Major Changes The university is considering making major changes to the college radio station Changes would include an expansion of the station s broadcasting range which would allow the radio s programmi 53
- Using the examples from the lecture, discuss two types of narrators that an author of fiction might use. 88
- Emotional Intelligence We often think of human intelligence as the mental ability to analyze and understand complex ideas However many psychologists believe that there is a different type of intelligence called emotional intelligence People with emotional 80
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 592.248995984 141% => OK
No of words: 217.0 155.574297189 139% => OK
Chars per words: 3.85714285714 3.80514564318 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.525876923 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.04845837119 1.79077849142 114% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 93.7148594378 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483870967742 0.604071249207 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Syllable count: 275.4 185.844578313 148% => OK
Avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.19417670683 109% => OK
Performance on coherence:
Topic speech coherence ratio: 0.0974741593383 0.0650381309087 150% => OK
Acoustic performance on paragraphs:
How many acoustic paragraphs: 2.0 4.35341365462 46% => OK
Average paragraph length: 108.5 68.503853103 158% => OK
STD paragraph length: 62.5 21.3332995233 293% => Paragraph length changes often.
Average paragraph duration: 29.845 25.9943957902 115% => OK
STD paragraph duration: 18.995 7.84667146824 242% => The duration of acoustic paragraphs changes often.
Acoustic performance on sentences:
How many acoustic sentences: 33.0 42.0642570281 78% => OK
Average acoustic sentence length: 6.57575757576 4.02192344571 163% => OK
STD acoustic sentence length: 5.62478445664 3.1217529195 180% => OK
Average acoustic sentences duration: 1.78515151515 1.45093177766 123% => OK
STD acoustic sentences duration: 1.17971779166 0.99851816184 118% => OK
Acoustic performance on acoustic silence:(An acoustic silence means a little pause between two or more words)
How many acoustic silence: 32.0 39.0421686747 82% => OK
Total acoustic silence duration: 5.84 7.12997991968 82% => OK
Average acoustic silence duration: 0.1825 0.185688545393 98% => OK
STD acoustic silence duration: 0.122983738762 0.155154303396 79% => OK
Acoustic performance on acoustic words:
Total word duration: 50.53 47.1480722892 107% => OK
Average word duration: 0.232857142857 0.305395592593 76% => Maybe the speed rate is very high.
STD word duration: 0.143626958104 0.189427763521 76% => OK
Disfluencies: like hesitations, or 'ehn' or taking a long time to pronounce a word:
How many disfluencies: 6.0 7.94979919679 75% => OK
Total_disfluencies_duration: 4.17 6.2937751004 66% => OK
Total acoustic noise duration: 0.8 3.39508032129 24% => Good job. The lower, the better.
Acoustic rates:
Total speech duration: 59.69 59.7592369478 100% => OK
Compare to expected duration: 0.994833333333 0.995987282463 100% => OK
Rate of silence: 0.536103199866 0.656000678711 82% => OK
Rate of speech: 3.63544982409 2.60215298798 140% => OK
Rate of speech by unique words: 1.75908862456 1.56821927147 112% => OK
Rate of word duration by unique words: 2.0779734811 1.99336655568 104% => OK
Average articulation rates: 0.436091414747 0.317803793328 137% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by speech e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the speech e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas.