Biotechnology companies all over the world are developing different types of genetically modified (GM) crops. However, not enough is known about the effects of these crops on our health and on environment. Inferring with nature in this way should be prohibited. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Biotechnology has two sides of influences onto crops (genetically modified ones), which can be able to maintain one’s healthy diet program by absorbing various nutritional values from it, whereas this side effect can be fatal to the health. In my perspective, while I understand the fatal potential risk for consuming GM crops, the benefits from such crops cannot be ignored. Therefore, the wise consumption should be recommended.
To begin with, the richness in its substances, which enhanced by chemical aids, can be able to maintain the healthy diet programs. With the enhancement nutritional values within the GM foods, which contains various nutritional values such as vitamin, proteins, omega 3, calcium, potassium etc, can provide the maximized value for fewer intakes. Therefore, people can take a lesser amount of food for the higher nutrition values.
In addition, the GM produces future opportunities to grow. The use of biotechnology makes the foods to be available throughout the year by efficient land usage, regardless with the unsustainable climates; such as cyclone, drought and other weather issues due to the global warming. Therefore, people can enjoy from constant healthy diet all year round by foods being available during unconventional growing seasons.
In contrast, the GM crops which influence on human’s health are leading to fatal maladies because inclusive of chemical substances within, thus some experts claim that such crops should be banned. The accumulation of such unknown chemical substances within one’s body is unknown but the past studies have discovered that it led to several chronic, respiratory and cell destruction. For example, the National Centre for Health Statistics stated that, the percentage of Americans with chronic illness jumped from 7% to 13% in just 9 years during the genetically modified crops being popular. Also, food allergies in children rose from 2.4% to 5.1% from 1997 to 2011. From this research, we can conclude that the genetically modified crops can directly effect on human’s health.
In conclusion, GM crops have several benefits related to growing and the nutritional value despite the critical health issues. Therefore, the amount of intake of GM crops should be monitored and watched closely to prevent any other potential health risks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-27 | Calvinthebeast | 89 | view |
| 2017-12-29 | jayjay | 61 | view |
| 2016-09-14 | hyangsu21@hanmail.net | 78 | view |
| 2016-09-14 | Monica1 | 78 | view |
| 2016-09-14 | Monica1 | 73 | view |
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of income taxes 84
- The pie graphs below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years.pie comparison 73
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000. 56
- The rising levels of congestion and air pollution found in most of the world cities can be attributed directly to the rapidly increasing number of private cars in use In order to reverse this decline in the quality of life in cities attempts must be made 81
- The bar chart below gives information about the number of students studying Computer Science at a UK university between 2010 and 2012 84
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'whereas', 'while', 'for example', 'in addition', 'in conclusion', 'in contrast', 'such as', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.276995305164 0.247107183377 112% => OK
Verbs: 0.119718309859 0.155533422707 77% => OK
Adjectives: 0.115023474178 0.0946595960268 122% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0328638497653 0.0501214627716 66% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0140845070423 0.0437548338989 32% => OK
Prepositions: 0.12441314554 0.122226691241 102% => OK
Participles: 0.0446009389671 0.0403226058552 111% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.87298506955 2.80594681477 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0328638497653 0.0326793684256 101% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.075117370892 0.0861772015684 87% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0281690140845 0.021408717616 132% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0093896713615 0.011925033212 79% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2329.0 1933.35771543 120% => OK
No of words: 360.0 316.048096192 114% => OK
Chars per words: 6.46944444444 6.12580529183 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20517956788 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.436111111111 0.374742101984 116% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.341666666667 0.28420135186 120% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.25 0.203846283523 123% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.163888888889 0.137316102897 119% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87298506955 2.80594681477 102% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.037074148 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561111111111 0.56093040696 100% => OK
Word variations: 62.8556612107 60.7387585426 103% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0891783567 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.5 20.7743622355 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0771476546 49.517814964 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.5625 127.492653851 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7743622355 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.875 0.814263465372 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.99599198397 0% => OK
Readability: 56.6666666667 49.1944974215 115% => OK
Elegance: 2.67605633803 1.69124875643 158% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338104053171 0.332605444948 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0990993499709 0.102741220458 96% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0494636951315 0.0668466124924 74% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.572181500855 0.534860350844 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.144661541124 0.148594505496 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145196745415 0.134430193775 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691451948537 0.0742795772207 93% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.354832072692 0.324371583561 109% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0330811852199 0.0638462369009 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231755567071 0.228012699653 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571756155981 0.058150111329 98% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.68436873747 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.41683366733 59% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 5.90881763527 51% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.5751503006 39% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 1.9629258517 51% => OK
Total topic words: 5.0 10.4468937876 48% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.