Should schools make it compulsory to learn a foreign language

Essay topics:

Should schools make it compulsory to learn a foreign language?

Recently, the phenomenon of compulsory learning of a foreign language and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of prestigious schools are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that foreign languages can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, learning a foreign language can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of efficient schools, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of compulsory learning. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of international language are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, compulsory learning of a foreign language can provide the community with negative impacts, which are associated with the reality that the demerits of inefficient learning are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described traditional schools. Hence, predicted outcomes of a foreign language are critical.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of learning a foreign language far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of compulsory learning prove the significance of a modern school, but also pinpoint possible implications.

Votes
Average: 9.3 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 221, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to prove'
Suggestion: to prove
...o the advantages of compulsory learning prove the significance of a modern school, bu...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1320.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 230.0 242.827586207 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73913043478 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27776492616 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604347826087 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0792915546 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389188604119 0.242375264174 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137895046558 0.0925447433944 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822060400423 0.071462118173 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237082981724 0.151781067708 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322711879545 0.0609392437508 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.33 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.