The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020, with predictions for 2030 and 2040.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The graph illustrates the percentage of the urban population in four Asian countries over a half-century period from 1970 to 2020, with predictions for another decade form 2030 to 2040.
Overall, the general trend for four Southeastern Asian countries was upward over 50 years, predicted to extend in the following decades. Noticeably, regarding the first year of the reported timescale, Philippines started off with the highest percentage of the population living in the cities, while Indonesia with the lowest one. The situation will be altered in in the future, in which the percentage in Malaysia reached the peak of the whole graph, whereas that in Thailand hit the trough of the total statistics.
Particularly, between 1970 and 2020, at the starting point of 32%, Philippines saw a plateau in its percentage throughout a decade that then shortly rose by 18% in another decade later. Throughout a dip by 10% from 1990 to 2010, the figures reached the point at 45% in 2020. Malaysia, on the contrary, had its statistics gradually rising to 45% in the first couple of decades, from which they accelerating to 75% eventually. Starting as the third highest, the proportion of urban residents for Thailand underwent a gradual increase by 10%, almost flattening of in the tree last decades of the past period. The most remarkable case went for Indonesia, where the percentage skyrocketed throughout years to 50% in 2020.
Between 2030 and 2040, the statistical patterns similar to those in the previous period will still continue. Philippines will be predicted to reached an end of 50%, whereas Malaysia will surpass other three countries in terms of statistical data at its ending point of 85%. Followed the top position of the figures for Malaysia will be those for Indonesia at the final percentage of 60%. And Thailand will be recorded as the nation that will share the smallest section of figureheads, at 50% in the final year of the whole period.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and ma 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rele 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below show the performance of spending on roads and transport in four countries from 1990 to 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The graph illustrates the percentage of ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he first year of the reported timescale, Philippines started off with the highest...
^^
Line 2, column 364, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: in
...est one. The situation will be altered in in the future, in which the percentage in ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, regarding, so, still, then, third, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 33.7804878049 201% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 965.302439024 170% => OK
No of words: 324.0 196.424390244 165% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0524691358 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 3.73543355544 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81304769092 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 106.607317073 154% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506172839506 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 471.6 283.868780488 166% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.470637535 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.923076923 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9230769231 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61538461538 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21650454409 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837365042631 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0901293135944 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177164966252 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119232370566 0.0819641961636 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 40.7170731707 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.