The line graph illustrates the proportion of the population living in urban areas in four Asian countries from 1970 to 2020, with predicted figures for 2030 and 2040. Overall, what stands out from the line graph is that all countries will witness a dramatic increase in their urban populations, with Malaysia predicted to experience the greatest growth.
In 1970, the Philippines and Malaysia had the highest proportions of urban population, standing at around 32% and 30% respectively. The number of urban residents in both countries then experienced a moderate increase, reaching approximately 48% in the Philippines, which was surpassed by Malaysia at 46% in 1990. From 2000 onwards, the figure for Malaysia continued to increase dramatically, projected to peak at over 85% in 2040, while the figure for the Philippines fluctuated before growing to around 55% by the end of the period.
Regarding Thailand and Indonesia, Thailand’s urban population comprised just two-thirds of the populations of the two countries mentioned earlier, while in Indonesia, the figure stood just below Thailand’s at 13% in 1970. Over thirty years, the proportion of people living in cities in both countries experienced gradual growth, reaching the same level of just below 30% in 2000. The population is then predicted to rise to around 62% in Indonesia and approximately 48% in Thailand by 2040.
- The pie chart give information about visitors to the US from different countries from 1988 to 1992 84
- Most university graduates earn more money than less well educated people Some people argue that this means they should pay the full cost of their education To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The chart below shows the average cost of monthly contract for four different mobile cell phones in a European country from January to September 2002 measured in euro Given is the line chart illustrating the average monthly spending on four cell phones in 77
- Some people give more importance to artists painters writers musicians in the current age of rapidly developing technology and science What do you think Do people prefer arts to technology in your views 61
- The plan below shows the village of Pebbleton 20 years ago and now 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1172.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35159817352 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04101361524 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529680365297 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.3478162012 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.5 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.375 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311845901924 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144495188382 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154610352722 0.0843802449381 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221111000833 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139485477759 0.0819641961636 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.2329268293 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.