The Graph Below Shows The Average Number Of Vietnamese Students Studying In France, America And Russia Between 2000 And 2015
The line graph gives information about the quantity of pupils in Vietnam that studied abroad in three different countries over the period 15 years.
Overall, the period from 2000 to 2015 saw a considerable growth in the number of Vietnamese students in America, while the quantity of students in Vietnam studying in France fluctuated slightly. The figure for Vietnamese pupils in Russia experienced a minimal variation with the lowest number of Vietnamese students at the end of the period shown.
In the year 2000, the number of national students from Vietnam studying in France was the largest, by around 3.5 million students. In contrast, the Vietnamese who learned in America was the lowest, about 2 millions fewer than the quantity of France's overseas students from Vietnam. During the next 10 years, there was a strong rise in the number of Vietnamese's students in America whereas the figure for this in Russia dropped continuously.
In 2010, the figure for Vietnam's foreign students in America was the highest and surpassed the number of students from Vietnam studying abroad in France by around five hundred thousand pupils. In the next 5 years, the figure for national students from Vietnam studied in all three countries saw a gradual increase, but the students who was Vietnamese studied in America continued to climb the most dramatically and reached a peak of 5 millions in 2015 while the quantity of Vietnam's pupils in Russia went on increasing but was still the lowest in comparison with the other two countries, reached about 2.5 millions at the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-19 | L_i_n_h_coi | 61 | view |
| 2022-09-19 | L_i_n_h_coi | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2021-08-29 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- Some people believe that the government should not spend money on international aid when they have their own disadvantaged people like the homeless and unemployed To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of the day working adults spent doing different activities in a particular country in 1958 and in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart illustrates average CO2 emissions per person in four European countries between 1975 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
- Some people believe that the government should not spend money on international aid when they have their own disadvantaged people like the homeless and unemployed To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The given line graph illustrates clients average every year spending on mobile phone national and international land line and services 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1322.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 262.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04580152672 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64565219843 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.43893129771 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 386.1 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 97.00096649 43.030603864 225% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 165.25 112.824112599 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.75 22.9334400587 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338932846621 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190119100441 0.103423049105 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742847497291 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235585929494 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108656727202 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.