Many people think modern communication technology is having some negative effects on relationships. Do you agree or disagree?
In the state-of-the-art technological alteration in conversation among people, there is troubling downstream influence on the relationship that is worthwhile considering. In my perspective, I totally admitted that this phenomenon has a negative side to our community for some reasons.
On the one hand, social isolation is a consequence of the digital era with the emergence of advanced technology. Indeed, with the advent of smartphones as well as social networking websites, people experienced a gradual substitute electronic one to physical relation. Apparently, in some circumstances, it is straightforward to capture into young generations via Facebook or Instagram which are skimming flotilla within the communication to their companions. In another situation, people have been ignorant internal relationships with the entire family that is having a virtual conversation with strangers instead.
There are widely acknowledged that social etiquette is declining due to the lack of face-to-face communication. It is obvious that adolescents tend to make emoticons or short commands to convey their emotions and feeling. Nevertheless, people are wreck the nature of friendship to invest quality time to make a virtual friend which might not have a minimum degree of loyalty and reliability. Indeed, a clone one persuaded me to transfer 200000 VND into a bank account, but I had just known them yet, thus it made me precaution ever since.
In conclusion, there is detrimental to people’s relationship and so more people should be cautioned the technology of communication improvement going forwards that they could be able to raise awareness about how to utilize the technology properly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-27 | TranMinhDuc | 78 | view |
- The diagrams below show the water supply system in Australia at present and in future Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 82
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 73
- The diagram shows rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The diagrams give information about changes in a student accommodation 84
- Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements and this is a bad example to adolescents To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, nevertheless, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1444.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.640625 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43895343918 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.65234375 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.634431518 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.272727273 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2727272727 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.18181818182 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186314568619 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556772252678 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529249341983 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105987614527 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462089499944 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.39 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.