Alternative forms of transport should be encouraged and international laws introduced to control car ownership and use. What are your views
Cars have shaped our world since they first rolled off mass-production lines in the early 20th century. However pollution from the exhaust fumes of the millions of cars in the world has become a major problem. Therefore, many advocate the use of alternative modes of transport to gas-powered vehicles, and they argue that international laws to restrict private ownership of cars are necessary. I do support these ideas.
The truth is that gas-powered cars have caused a significant rise in greenhouse gases internationally. So the pollutants are airborne where they can mix with water vapor, forming acid rain which is responsible for large-scale habitant loss. Thus, in some countries, electric cars have grown in popularity. Although, they may not always be able to travel the required distances and their modest speeds fail to compete with gas-powered cars, they are cleaner and quieter, and the hope is that, with new battery technology, electric cars would eventually replace conventional cars. Moreover, public transportation has become an intrinsic feature of most modern cities such as London, Paris and Moscow, which boast some of the biggest and busiest underground systems in Europe, and which are continuing to expand, providing services for more people. Besides that, in an effort to reduce the pollution from cars, authorities are promoting electric train systems as an alternative mode of transportation.
Furthermore, international laws can encourage people to use public transport. such as: presenting an environmental tax gas or increasing the taxes on flights so that will lead civilization to embrace buses or electric trains instead of planes or cars. By this way, we can take steps to control the car use as well as car ownership.
In summary, although we cannot deny the contribution cars have made to our lives, we must also recognize the untold harm they cause to the environment. New forms of transportation, using eco-friendly power and worldwide laws to restrict the use of private cars can help save our environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-04-13 | tuantransgc | 89 | view |
- The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts 84
- Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- Some countries encourage teenagers to have part-time job and see it as a good thing, while others disagree. Give your opinion and explain both views 73
- Should parks in city be replaced by different purposes. do you agree or disagree 78
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...uction lines in the early 20th century. However pollution from the exhaust fumes of the...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun advocate seems to be countable; consider using: 'many advocates'.
Suggestion: many advocates
... has become a major problem. Therefore, many advocate the use of alternative modes of transpo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 999, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... an alternative mode of transportation. Furthermore, international laws can enco...
^^^
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Such
...courage people to use public transport. such as: presenting an environmental tax gas...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, in summary, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1725.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29141104294 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05159226696 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616564417178 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.7814345458 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225571565458 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805147354273 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0901130789 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149175946395 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558989081692 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.