Human beings have been receiving benefits from automobiles. The development of cars enables us to travel distant places ,transport people and goods and also facilitated the social and cultural exchange. However, automobiles have brought many disadvantages to our lives as well. The number of casualties from car accidents have been increased as well as animals killed on the road by cars. I agree with the opinion that the invention of cars have degraded the quality of peoples life. Automobiles are dangerous and often cause severe damage to people's body and lives. Also, the invention of cars lead to the destruction of environments and gives stress to drivers.
First of all, automobiles could be detrimental the case of a car accident. The invention of the car enabled people to quickly transport to distant places, but sometimes the swiftness could be dangerous to people. Although there are several technologies to make driving safe, driving carelessly and drunk driving can seriously damage a driver's body or even kill them. Furthermore, car accidents causes financial loss in terms of hospital and repairing fees. In retrospect, I once had a car crash a few years ago, and I damaged my left ankle, which I had to stay in the hospital for several months, which I had to pay a lot in addition to getting my car fixed. Also, car accidents could harm innocent pedestrians. Especially, pedestrians have no protection such as air bags, which means that they are more likely to suffer from heavy injuries. Considering the influence of car accidents, the use of automobiles can lead to destruction of our quality of life.
Moreover, the use of automobiles severely impacts the environment. The combustion of fossil fuels by automobiles release carbon dioxide which accelerates global warming. Due to the impact of global warming, climate change is taking place and number of natural disasters such as typhoons and tornadoes are increasing. Furthermore, as the average temperature increases, people will have to suffer from the hot, humid weather. If people keep insisting on using automobiles, humans cannot sustain the quality of their life. Also, cars discharge toxic chemicals such as carbon monoxide and benzene peroxide which both degrades the quality of air makes people cough and even kill them. For example, in the 1970's Britain, many people died from smog, which is a combination between car fumes and natural fog. According to a research, these chemicals are not only harmful for your body organs but also carcinogenic, which means that they cause cancer. Fresh air is necessary for people to live, stay healthy and enjoy outside activities. Therefore, the use of automobiles will threaten people's health and eventually degrade people's quality of life.
In addition, driving a car could be a stressful work. Have you ever had experience of getting stressed when stuck in a traffic jam? These days the excessive number of cars creates heavy traffic on the road, causing both inevitable mental and physical stress to a driver. For example, drivers could feel extreme fatigue just by sitting in a car for few hours. Also, when pressed for time, for example when you're late for school or work, the stress could be detrimental. According to a research conducted by Australia National University, the more time you are driving, both the amount of stress you get and the risk of hemorrhoids and depression gets higher. Thus, the stress of driving applies to drivers affects people's quality of life.
In conclusion, automobiles could seriously destroy our quality of life. People are endangered from car accidents, and the environmental impact automobile causes affects people's health and the natural habitats. Furthermore it will seriously affect the quality of people's lives
- TPO-13 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 78
- When people succeed in life it is because of hard work Being lucky has nothing to do with success in life Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position 91
- Spending time with intelligent friends is better than the humorous persons? agree or disagree 82
- A/D: Playing computer games is a waste of time and children should not be allowed to play them. 90
- TPO-29 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...cars enables us to travel distant places ,transport people and goods and also faci...
^^
Line 1, column 544, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
...gerous and often cause severe damage to peoples body and lives. Also, the invention of ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 406, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: you're
...when pressed for time, for example when youre late for school or work, the stress cou...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 211, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...eoples health and the natural habitats. Furthermore it will seriously affect the quality of...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 13.8261648746 181% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3185.0 1977.66487455 161% => OK
No of words: 612.0 407.700716846 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20424836601 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.97379470361 4.48103885553 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78349037736 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 298.0 212.727598566 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486928104575 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 996.3 618.680645161 161% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 11.0 3.08781362007 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 35.0 20.6003584229 170% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5451914813 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4857142857 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 29.0 3.85842293907 752% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175966002218 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059180607991 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10517605309 0.0737576698707 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126504639866 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0808176899382 0.0645574589148 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 155.0 86.8835125448 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.