) Give up to three practical examples of how you intend to use the knowledge, skills and connections you will gain from your scholarship. Possible tasks can be personal and/or professional; and
b) list any possible constraints you think may prevent you from achieving these tasks.*:
a) The knowledge, skills and connections gaining from Australia Award Scholarship would help me accomplish my duty in various ways. First, the training can further my research in the professional field, which is crucial in making any recommendation for Vietnamese Policy framework, the S&T Enterprise Decree, the supportive ecosystem that fosters and enables entrepreneurship and innovation and so on. Second, by sharpening my skills on leadership, critical and creative thinking and problem-solving, I hope to influence and lead young generation, S&T provincial departments, to inspire, motivate them the spirit of entrepreneurship and innovation, to provide them with enough capabilities to consult S&T enterprises and address challenges in an innovate way. Last but not least, becoming a member of international experts, academics and Australia Awards Scholars network, I seek to get professional advice and any cooperation opportunities in the field of entrepreneurship and innovation. For instance, I would have information of market-feasible technologies via the network, then, transfer them to Vietnam, to apply and enhance the productivity of S&T enterprises.
b) The long-held belief of many Vietnamese officials is by far the first challenge while promoting the S&T enterprises development. Indeed, the traditional thought of “managing” instead of “supporting” along with their “manager” style when consulting enterprises are hard to change. Another obstacle comes from the inefficiency policy framework for Innovation or IP commercialization. To illustrate, if an IP results from a government-funded project of an enterprise, the enterprise also has to make a complex IP right or IP usage right transfer procedure. Last, a lack of a wealth of marketable innovation is definitely a major challenge. In fact, many innovations result from government-funded projects are difficult to translate into the market because it is unmatched with enterprises’ need or it is not ready for use.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: A
a The knowledge, skills and connections g...
^
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'The' is left.
Suggestion: a; The
a The knowledge, skills and connections gaini...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 743, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...T enterprises and address challenges in an innovate way. Last but not least, becoming a mem...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: B
...e the productivity of S&T enterprises. b The long-held belief of many Vietnamese...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, then, while, as to, for instance, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1733.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.87457627119 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.0013987787 2.80592935109 143% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627118644068 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.3995418361 49.4020404114 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.545454545 106.682146367 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8181818182 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.38176352705 46% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0562441646119 0.244688304435 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0237528897505 0.084324248473 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338172834882 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0444500167442 0.151304729494 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233075775806 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.44 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.7795591182 186% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 0.67 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.