Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books. Experimental learning or traditional learning in high school and university, Which one do you agree is more effective?
The fact that experience teaches us more effectively compared to printed books was always a debatable topic. Many people believe that learning through experimental methods will enable us think out of the box and it plays a major role during hard times. I strongly agree with the statement that knowledge we gain from practical knowledge are worth compared to traditional subjects. This essay would further discuss the reasons why learning through observing particular things is more useful with example.
First and foremost, experimental learning is nothing but information that we earn from our daily activities in high schools and universities. It is not limited it will be varied from situation to situation. These experiences help us to rectify our future act. In addition, each and every situation is not mentioned in the books that we read and taught by institutional faculty members and high school teachers, few things we learn from our practice that we face in our hard times. For example, no book or no classroom lecture will teach us how to live our life alone, how to share feelings with others and final important one how to create self-respect, it is the tough situations that we go through in our life will explain us how to overcome all these problems.
Furthermore, content in the printed material provide only basic knowledge of particular topic related to subjects such as Math, physics, chemistry and many more but these practical functions can be implemented only we have better tests in laboratories and work in that respective area. The hardest and important lessons we learn comes from our daily participation handling different cases and master those skills by practice. Learning from our own mistakes and disasters will help us deal with life in all conditions.
According to the arguments aforementioned, one can reach out to conclusion that teachers and parents will provide us guidelines but our experience to that particular situation gives the perfection of life. In a nutshell, it can clearly concluded that advantages of experimental learning outweighs traditional concept in all educational departments and it is predicted that in near future all organizations implement practice through learning.
- Some people believe that the sole aim of higher education is to make people ready for employment. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Discuss 77
- Children should take large number of exams or learn more in schools 76
- It is foolish to get married before completing your studies and getting established in a good job. Do you agree or disagree? 65
- In academic studies grouping students according to academic abilities is good or not good Give your opinion 89
- Medical technology can increase the humans life expectancy. Is it blessing or curse? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 237, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'conclude'
Suggestion: conclude
... of life. In a nutshell, it can clearly concluded that advantages of experimental learnin...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, so, for example, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 8.36945812808 215% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 48.0 20.9802955665 229% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 31.9359605911 147% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1886.0 1207.87684729 156% => OK
No of words: 357.0 242.827586207 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28291316527 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 3.92707691288 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93620227635 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 139.433497537 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551820728291 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 379.143842365 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.6215026907 50.4703680194 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.714285714 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 20.9669160288 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 7.25397266985 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196681378588 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744771130189 0.0925447433944 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567376523507 0.071462118173 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127503323335 0.151781067708 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0693544863806 0.0609392437508 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.1260098522 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.