With the advancement of technology, new encroachments are visible in the field of medicine and one aspect is video conferencing between patient and doctor. There is a heated debate about the advantages as well as disadvantages of online consulting of doctors. This essay will discuss how convenient this mechanism for people and on the flip side the limited ways for a doctor to diagnose a patient.
Firstly, consulting a doctor through video conferencing makes easier for patients. Generally, people have to make prior appointments and go to channel centres or hospitals to meet a doctor. In certain instances doctors get late and people have to wait long hours in queues which wastes their precious time and money. Therefore, information technology has created a community friendly platform to overcome these obstacles.
On the other hand, online consulting narrows a doctor’s opportunities to diagnose a patient. A patient should be thoroughly checked before prescribing medicine. Although medical reported can be checked online, the doctor is not possible to see the patient’s real condition such as tests done by touching. Hence, in order to diagnose some patients with special conditions the patient has to visit the doctor.
In summary, video communication with a doctor allows patients to contact the doctor easily but there are limitations for diagnosing. In my opinion, this method is useful for non-critical sudden requirements and for other occasions, doctors should physically examine patients to avoid undesirable situations.
- Certain kinds of music promote learning in theirlife. Agree or disagree. 72
- In town and cities the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop Do you agree or disagree 86
- Technological access to online music and the like should be free or paid. What do you think? 77
- Whether studying films at school is as important as studying literature? 77
- Medical technology can increase the humans life expectancy. Is it blessing or curse? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, so, therefore, well, as to, in summary, such as, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 5.94088669951 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 20.9802955665 29% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1323.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 238.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55882352941 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10428004888 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626050420168 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3834071439 50.4703680194 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.769230769 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3076923077 20.9669160288 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30769230769 7.25397266985 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230855640621 0.242375264174 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892309209278 0.0925447433944 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771818414458 0.071462118173 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144245585783 0.151781067708 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438609806721 0.0609392437508 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.