The reading states that Buzzers, hired by advertisement companies, who promote the products to people should be banned, and provides three reasons for support. However, the lecturer casts doubts on the claims made in the reading by presenting counter-arguments. He believes that they shouldn't be banned, as they are worth hiring.
First of all, the author points out that buzzers are being paid for advertising the product, so they might give an incorrect information. This point is challenged by the lecturer. He says in spite of the fact that they are being paid for advertising the products, the company hired them because the buzzer believes that it's a great product.
Secondly, the author contends that since they are private individuals unlike companies, so the customers listen to their endorsements less critically and ask fewer questions about the products. The lecturer rebuts this argument. He suggests that people ask a lot more questions to buzzers. In addition, if not answered rightly, the customer won't buy the product.
Finally, the author states that buzzing is likely to have harmful effects on the social relationship. The article establishes that once the customer will get to know that buzzers are being paid, they will trust less. The professor, on the other hand, posits that if the products are likely to be good, which is good, the customers will have a good experience. Therefore, they will have more trust and will be open to people.
- Many companies sell products or services but at the same time cause environmental damage. Someone said it can be stop by ask them to pay penalty, such as a higher tax when they cause the environmental damage. Others said there are better ways to stop them 80
- TPO-19 - Integrated Writing Task Many consumers ignore commercial advertisements. In response, advertising companies have started using a new tactic, called “buzzing." The advertisers hire people,buzzers,who personally promote (buzz) products to people 85
- TPO-46 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, medical information about patients traditionally has been recorded and stored on paper forms. However, there are efforts to persuade doctors to adopt electronic medical record systems in which informa 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 285, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...ounter-arguments. He believes that they shouldnt be banned, as they are worth hiring. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...d them because the buzzer believes that its a great product. Secondly, the autho...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, in addition, first of all, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1231.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 240.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12916666667 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73518420566 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558333333333 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.4509951295 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.9285714286 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1428571429 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06452816374 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.4114370031 0.272083759551 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13084106764 0.0996497079465 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.082760131725 0.0662205650399 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233527931066 0.162205337803 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560514747865 0.0443174109184 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.