Nowadays, it is commonly accepted that doing some repeating works during days is really boring and tiring. Humans naturally needed variety in their lives and our tasks during workdays are not independent of this law. Contrary to this popular beliefs there are still those who argue that workers preferred to have some similar tasks every day because having a routine work led to they have less difficulty on their works When they do some things every day they find more skill on their task. I, to a great extent, agree with this idea that if workers have various type of tasks are more happy and satisfied.
First and foremost, repeating task can be caused by depression and illness. All of us based on our habitual behavior interested in variety in our life. But because of altering in lifestyle and living in crowdy big cities led to we separate from natural. In each day we have a lot of work that should be to do and must be working fastly as soon as possible. It is led to we have a uniform program every day. However, the psychologist substantiated that repeat and high uniformity can be increased the possibility of some mental illness, for example, stress, depression and Alzheimer's. Thus, they suggested that people providing variety as possible as on their daily programs. Our jobs established the major part of our people live. Therefore, the managers should be seriously regarded to prevent from determining similar tasks for their employees.
On another significant fact, that should be taken into the consideration is that having the different type of tasks led to the developing of employees. Because led to they try to learn some new things and the improvement of their resume and reaching better vocation position. For example, I am working as a lab engineer in national institute of genetics and biotechnology. I was selected to work on specialize miRNA services. After several months I felt if I remain just in this limited portion I cannot be learning about another my interested field in genetic science, and maybe after sometimes my knowledge became old and ineffective. Thus, I spoke with my supervisor and suggest to him to let me to working as a research assistant in the new field. This experience was very helpful for me because as a result, I put some published paper on my CV.
On the basis of reasons that mentioned above, I am convinced that having various type of tasks have more beneficial for employees and bosses. Because people who are happier, more mental health, are more efficiency in personal and their vocation life.
- TPO 41 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO 11 75
- Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. 75
- In today's world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, really, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, as a result, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2124.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 437.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86041189931 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67573539958 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7724831116 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5454545455 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8636363636 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95454545455 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253812092323 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654284267753 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0736474142242 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162063083249 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107958468183 0.0645574589148 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.