Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small number of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money.
Discuss and give opinions
There is a tendency that some minority languages are on the edge of disappearance. It is argued that whether governments should allocate expenditure to save these languages, while some opponents believe this is a waste of money. Personally, I think that these languages deserve to be preserved.
On one hand, there are several reasons why some people against governments spent money on saving minority languages. Firstly, to make sure more people will be willing to learn these languages, a large amount of money has to be spent on facilities, teaching staffs and propagandizing. This money could be spent on other more urgent livelihood issues such as healthcare and infrastructure. Secondly, it might be of no effect even governments make a lot of effort to saving less-widely spoken languages. The public lack of will to study minority languages for a reason, because it might be impractical for them. Governments are incapable of forcing people to learn if they are not willing to.
On the other hand, despite the above arguments, I believe that governments should not allow these languages to extinct. A language is much more than simply a means of communication, behind the language itself, there is culture, custom and tradition related to it. If a language disappears, a whole way of life will disappear with it which would be a great loss for both country and the whole human society. The cultural diversity is what makes this world more colorful. By spending money on minority language preservation, a vast amount of cultural heritages can be saved in the meantime.
In conclusion, it may save money in the short term if governments allow minority languages to disappear. But in the long term this would have an extremely negative impact on cultural diversity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-09 | goodluck0101 | 89 | view |
| 2018-05-09 | goodluck0101 | 39 | view |
| 2018-04-08 | mocmeo | 61 | view |
| 2014-06-14 | Katherine2811 | 82 | view |
- Many countries use fossil fuels such as coal or oil as the main sources of energy. However, in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged.Do you think this a positive or negative development? 56
- People aim to achieve the balance between their work and lives but few people achieve it What are the causes of the problems How to overcome it 79
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals suffer, while others are in favor of them 73
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small number of people Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages while others believe that would be a waste of money Discuss and give 89
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eritages can be saved in the meantime. In conclusion, it may save money in the ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, as to, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10273972603 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96620421137 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530821917808 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7728170327 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.125 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393716309976 0.244688304435 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126848227741 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807928073373 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234087265716 0.151304729494 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0772715393472 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.