The graph represents how often did American people have fast-food for breakfast in restaurant within a decade, from 2003 to 2013.
As can be seen from the graph, from 2003 to 2006, the percentage of people who have never taken fast-food was reduced to 1%. On the other hand, during the same period, the number of clients using fast-food everyday has fallen by approximately 3%. By contrast, the proportion of US citizens who rarely ate fast-food (few times a year) rose 3% from the starting point. These three segments remained unchanged since 2013.
The sharp changes were shown in the groups, who ate fast-food as a weekly basis and also who visited the fast-food restaurant once or twice a month. The same amount of people of both groups ate fast-food in the year of 2003, 30% respectively, before fluctuated in a decade and ended up with around 27% for once a week group and 33% for once or twice a month group, in 2013.
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 11
- All children should study a foreign language, starting in the earliest grades. To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement ? 89
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 78
- All children should study a foreign language, starting in the earliest grades. To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement ? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
..., the number of clients using fast-food everyday has fallen by approximately 3%. By cont...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 765.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66463414634 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49487130086 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621951219512 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3372615022 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.285714286 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220865059693 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105838751353 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504311856452 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166518133221 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280636627942 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.