Cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or Disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of the expansion of cities and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that solving the commuting problems might be highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that a good transport service can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From standpoints of city planners, a better network for public transport system can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the facts that private transport, as well as high-density roads, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic research which discovered that people in capital cities use the public transport despite having private cars. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both improving the road and urban transport apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of transportation, using private cars might increase the consequences of saving a lot of time. Moreover, fundamental aspects of traffic restraint policies could relate to this reality that the demerits of congestion on roads lead to too much traffic in urban areas. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of traffic problem is correlated negatively with a difficult life for city dwellers. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of overcrowding the cities.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of spending budget on roads far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of efficient transport infrastructure prove the significance of transportation qualification, but also pinpoint the quality of urbanization implications.
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree? Or Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree. 88
- Mass media like TV, newspaper and radio influence people, particularly young generation. Do you think it works as a pivot to shape the society? What is your opinion? 77
- In academic studies, grouping students according to academic abilities is good or not good? Give your opinion. 88
- Cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or Disagree? 54
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56944444444 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26775037532 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 139.433497537 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649305555556 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1885763318 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.666666667 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15007029265 0.242375264174 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0459544129106 0.0925447433944 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400784197668 0.071462118173 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0786917859811 0.151781067708 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508632631548 0.0609392437508 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.75 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.