Some believe that modern technology is increasing the gap between rich and poor people, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Human lifestyle is pampered in the lap of technology. Presently, the ever widening gap between affluent and destitute segments of society has been a burning issue. Some people reckon that technology is the biggest reason behind this situation. By contrast, other have conflicting views. Here, I would like to account for both sides with my own perception.
There are manifold points to endorse the former view. First and foremost, a remarkable difference could be seen between the lifestyles of rich and poor class of people owing to technology. To demonstrate, homes of rich people are flooded with luxury facilities and technical gadgets such as air conditioners, home theatre, washing machines and other expensive equipments. In contrary, poor people are unable to afford such luxurious comforts in the era of inflation. Even, they struggle for two square meal for their family. Consequently, it is quite evident that the difference in terms of wealthy lifestyle is created by technology. What is more, the existence of machines in the working sectors is replacing thousand of labourers who belong to poor families. Thus, employing the use of technology boosts the profit of businessman who are already rich but the third class people are becoming even more poorer due to unemployment. On the contrary, others have conflicting views.
They think that unlike technology, the gap between high and low class people is emerged by illiteracy, unemployment and overpopulation. Taking a real life example of my country India, a massive number of people belong to down trodden families and they do not have money to afford expensive education. Apart from it, the number of job seekers is exceeding to the number of job vacancies due to population explosion. Hence, over population, illiteracy and unemployment are the prime factors causing a gigantic gap between haves and have-nots.
From my notion, both sides have their own significance. Undeniably, aristocratic lifestyle blessed by technology makes rich people owner of every comfort whereas poor are striving for their survival. However, unemployment, population explosion and and illiteracy still seem the robust factors behind this happening.
To recapitulate, the rising wealth gap between the rich and poor is one of the most worrying concern. Therefore, it is mandatory for the modern governments to take some effective remedial measure to restrain this menace.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-28 | tobiodunowo | 82 | view |
| 2018-07-26 | mary.ssherr | 78 | view |
| 2018-08-12 | Dan123 | 56 | view |
- science could help people live up to 100 or 200 years even would that be a good or bad development Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The tendency for human beings to follow one another is shown in the popularity of fashions in clothing and consumer goods. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement. 63
- "Failure is the proof that desire was notstrong enough", To what extend do youagree with this statement? Give reasonsfor your answer? 55
- International travel is extremely popular these days. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend? Include your opinion and examples from your own experience. 78
- Some people believe that a vertical city inwhich people work and live in tall buildings isa good idea. Others say that horizontal livingis better. Discuss both views and express youropinion 90
Comments
Check my all the recent
Check my all the recent essays sir along with this one. I will be thankful to u
Essay evaluation report
even more poorer
even more poor
--------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 23 15
No. of Words: 380 350
No. of Characters: 1986 1500
No. of Different Words: 214 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.415 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.226 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.79 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 156 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 119 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 84 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 61 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.522 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.324 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.478 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.262 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.466 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.022 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 712, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...nes in the working sectors is replacing thousand of labourers who belong to poor familie...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 900, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'poorer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: poorer
...he third class people are becoming even more poorer due to unemployment. On the contrary, o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 467, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... population, illiteracy and unemployment are the prime factors causing a gigantic...
^^
Line 9, column 245, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...ver, unemployment, population explosion and and illiteracy still seem the robust factor...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 35, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g. To recapitulate, the rising wealth gap between the rich and poor is one of...
^^
Line 11, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th gap between the rich and poor is one of the most worrying concern. Therefore,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, so, still, therefore, third, thus, whereas, apart from, such as, on the contrary, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2054.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40526315789 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94008027478 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573684210526 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 646.2 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4506280313 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3043478261 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5217391304 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08695652174 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19170485446 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051304603331 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387910498227 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112501853684 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374530099809 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.