Modern technology has been in the crust of human activities in recent years with the advent of gadgets and solutions that are changing our societies. To some people, a key result of modern technology is the increasing dichotomy being created between the rich and the poor while some think otherwise. Although there are valid points for each of the position, I will discuss both agree with the notion that modern technology is widening the gap between the rich and poor.
As effective and efficient as modern technology has proven to be, there has been questions on the affordability of new gadgets and technological products. Because of the amount of efforts and resources invested in the researches that birthed these technological breakthroughs, inventors are forced to make their products pricey in order to recover the cost of research. Consequently, many poor people are unable to purchase these new gadgets; whereas, the rich have no difficulty acquiring products of modern technology. For example, prices of mobile phones ranges from 50 US dollars to 5,000 US dollars. Although, the poor may be able to afford the cheap mobile phones, the difference in functionality compared with the expensive phones that rich people own creates a gap between these two categories.
The opposing view, however, argues that there has always been a gap between the rich and the poor before the recent breakthroughs in technology. In fact, all through the civilizations the world has experienced since existence, there has always been a difference between the rich and the poor, where the poor are unable to purchase products that denotes expensive lifestyles. Therefore, it would be incorrect to assume that recent advancement in technology is widening the gap between the rich and the poor.
In conclusion, I would agree that although modern technology is not solely responsible for the increasing differentiation between the poor and the rich, it is a contributing factor.
- Write a letter to your friend telling him/her that you have won a photography competition. In your letter– Describe the event.– Describe the photograph you have sent for the competition.–Invite him/her to the exhibition where your photograph is pres 89
- Some people believe that the radio is the best way to get news, while others believe that TV is better for this purpose. Discus both views and give your opinion 61
- Some believe that modern technology is increasing the gap between rich and poor people while others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 82
- Writing task 1 (a letter)You need to attend a family event. Your child will be missing school for a day. Write a letter to the school principal and say– What is the event?– Why is it important for your child to be there?– How will your child make up 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, may, so, therefore, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24683544304 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94045074791 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493670886076 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.5244364826 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.166666667 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58333333333 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358488729045 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14071000826 0.084324248473 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0972220273627 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2335178587 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0839907978305 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.