Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today’s society.
To what extent do you agree with this view?
Although advertisement has become an important part of every sphere of life, I believe that its different practices using are immoral and cannot be accepted. This essay will first discuss how it seems we cannot avoid unsolicitous advertisement and then, discuss it from social and health’s point of view.
First of all, it is not good that the advertisement is everywhere. It is on TV, on the internet, on the streets and even on our mobile phones. The TV is being used as a medium for hidden marketing as we watch unconsciously the display of products in a very artistic way. Advertisement boards are displayed on our streets which became full of their litter after some time and this is not good for our environment because they are made of disposable materials. Moreover, Companies are leveraging technology to advertise their products in numerous ways. For example, without our consent, mobile companies are broadcasting promotional messages after specific time intervals, and now they are even started calling us. Consequently, it goes to a point where it became intrusive and irritating. Because of this, a majority of people thinks these kinds of invasive and unsolicitous advertisement are unethical and cannot be accepted.
Other aspects of advertisement that I think is condemnable, it is creating social and health problems in our civilized societies. It encourages people to buy things which they do not need or they cannot afford, and because of this, their parents face financial pressure. Such as, children and particular youngster are being enticed to buy expensive toys and musical instruments. In addition to that, ads of alcoholic products are encouraging excessive consumption and underage drinking, yet restrictions are not being imposed by the government in the same way as on the tobacco products.
In conclusion, there is no doubt that advertisement has taken such a shape that we cannot exclude it from our life .therefore, we are continuously being disturbed and tempted with the different form of advertisement and that’s why this is not a merit.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-22 | Thilmi | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-24 | Sakthisv | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | Timjay | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-25 | hamzamanzoor | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-14 | Saira Faiz | 73 | view |
- Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today’s society.To what extent do you agree with this view? 61
- he internet has greatly increased our access to information. To what extent do you think this is a good thing?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 61
- Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today’s society.To what extent do you agree with this view? 78
- The Internet has increased our access to information.to what extent do think its a good thing. 78
- Currently there is a trend towards the use of alternative forms of medicine. However, at best these methods are ineffective, and at worst they may be dangerous.To what extent do you agree with this statement? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 115, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... that we cannot exclude it from our life .therefore, we are continuously being dis...
^^
Line 7, column 258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd that's why this is not a merit.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, first of all, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1759.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23511904762 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1102870768 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553571428571 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9306282004 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.266666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2666666667 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149871901681 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465278616592 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415330069126 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0954850574343 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309002122449 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.