Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is believed that the expense for foreigners to visit the monuments and tourism sites should be charged more than the residents in that country. I personally agree with this opinion.
Initially, the higher prices for foreign visitors will enhance and develop the tourism industry of the local area. Indeed, the extra fees that oversea tourists pay for the entrance and visiting activities can contribute to increase the income of tourism in these cultural and historical sites, which then, is invested in repairing and maintaining the architecture and facilities in these areas. Hence, the beauty and values of the important sites will be not temporary but lasted for longer, which serves the sustainable development of the local tourism.
Besides that, paying more for cultural and historical attractions is considered as a sense of respect toward local traditional values. In fact, the citizen if the country are the constructors and creators of the cultural buildings. Therefore, the foreign visitors should reward the incredible architectures and values belonging to these works as a genre of performance of their high appreciation by expending more money because the knowledge and experience that they obtained in the journey is valuable and deserved with what they spent.
In conclusion, the visiting fees in the places of cultural tourism and historic interest for oversea tourists should be higher than that for local people.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-12 | Rizvi007 | 56 | view |
2019-07-10 | fachryadul92 | 56 | view |
2018-06-05 | Kelly Pham | 56 | view |
2018-06-05 | Kelly Pham | 56 | view |
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interest, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Other disagree. Discuss both views and 73
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, if, so, then, therefore, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1221.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 226.0 315.596192385 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40265486726 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79598755388 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 176.041082164 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561946902655 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.8662462117 49.4020404114 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.666666667 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1111111111 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339072689361 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130249679875 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066015944538 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203980657182 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031990347193 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.