The trend of increased consumer goods production is damaging the natural environment. Why is it still happening? What are the solutions for this situation?
Nowadays, it can be observed that our natural environment is becoming unhealthier due to overproduction of consumer goods. This is happening mainly because of the tendency of the people to do more profit in their business as well as to mitigate the rising demand of the increased population. However, there are a number of solutions which can be implemented to deal with this problem.
Firstly, the reason for producing more and more consumer goods that influence negatively to our surroundings is that in this competitive era, to become the leading brand, the rat race is going on among the companies. As a result, a large proportion of products are being upgraded within a very short period that ultimately increases the bulk of the same products. Secondly, the production is mounting up as the demand is increasing proportionately by the number of increasing population and their individual choices. For instance, while a TV set was enough to entertain a whole family in the past, today, some people tend to have separate connections in separate rooms.
There are two effective solutions to the problem of producing more consumer goods. One way to tackle this is to recycling the household materials. For example, instead of throwing used plastic/glass bottles and papers, people can reuse them as flowerpot or water container and recycled papers respectively. Another way to cope with this situation is that a higher tax on imported materials should be imposed by the government; this certainly deters the buying tendency of people which, in turn, would limit the production of consumables from the company.
To conclude, in order to slash down the higher production of consumer goods, the decision of consumers is pivotal whether to buy the unnecessary things or not because by norms if the demand falls the production will no longer sustain.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-12 | Mardonbek Ro'zmetov | 84 | view |
| 2018-06-07 | faruke | 84 | view |
- Some believe that modern technology is increasing the gap between rich and poor people while others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 77
- Some people believe that it s not necessary to have internet access to live a full life What is your opinion Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience 90
- The trend of increased consumer goods production is damaging the natural environment Why is it still happening What are the solutions for this situation 84
- Some people use the internet to search for solutions to their medical problems Is it a Positive or negative development Give your own opinion and examples from your own experience 89
- The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15562913907 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9484500585 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582781456954 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.9018857762 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.75 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1666666667 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0833333333 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256136050201 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830689004311 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319840042557 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143060602035 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214710633252 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.