A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honor, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Today, it has been argued that some people are being evaluated by their social position and wealth while the people’s traditional view like sympathy and reliability seems to become insignificant. Although wealth and social position pioneered the people’s identity in today’s society, in my opinion, those traditional attitudes also have not exhausted yet.
Evaluating some people with their social position can be observed clearly in today’s society. In other words, many people who are affluent along with occupying top position are being honored and pampered in the society. Further, they can enjoy a range of privileges in almost every sector of the society because of having position and power of the money. For instance, a media superstar will be highly welcomed as a chairperson in any function of the society whereas a simple man would have to face many obstacles only to attend that function.
However, it would not be so ambitious to think that the people’s emotion, respect, and trustworthiness to others have not dried out till to date. Still, there are some people in the community who tend to dedicate themselves to helping others and also there are some who prove their honesty by their morality. Consequently, their identity has been built and they are also welcomed by the society. For example, a few months back a simple taxi-driver has become honored as a most reliable citizen by the state because he returned a carrying bag full with money to the owner while he left it in the taxi unnoticed.
To conclude, it is undeniable that the means to evaluate the people has changed over the period of time but still, the society does not forget to treat the honesty and kindness of its other members.
- The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 78
- Due to the use of computers and mobiles phones, letter-writing ability is disappearing. To what extent do you agree? 73
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honor, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 61
- Some people use the internet to search for solutions to their medical problems Is it a Positive or negative development Give your own opinion and examples from your own experience 89
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 90, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...valuate the people has changed over the period of time but still, the society does not forget ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, so, still, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07291666667 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77815752613 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538194444444 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.4881372281 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.818181818 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1818181818 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0984324963657 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0419233857111 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372817607777 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0606053951594 0.151304729494 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346215678932 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.