Information revolution has changed the way of mass communications and had some bad and good effects on individual lives as well as on society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of revolution in information and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although, contested by many, media communication implicitly impact individuals, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that latest changes in mass communication trends can be a plus and will analyze it through this essay.
To begin with, from sociological standpoint, the improvement in mass communication can provide society with some noticeable effects which is rooted in the fact that people get better and quicker hands on the information and breaking news which is inextricably bound up. In my own experience, an academic experiment conducted by myself in university discovers society relays mostly on the information medium like newspaper, TV news channels and now on social media provided information to make huge decisions like voting, takes initiative for the cause and so on. Thus, the beneficial ramification of importance and effects of mass media and its information can be seen apparently.
In contrast, within the realm of psychology, wrong might increase chaos. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of information through media relates to this reality that the demerits of relying only on someone's provided information is not at all a good approach. As a tangible example, a study carried by the fellows of a prestigiou university asserted the downside of media publicity is correlated negatively with not having the bitter truth behind the fancy curtains. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of harmful effects of media could be detrimental to governments as well
To recapitulate, although both sides have compelling arguments, I profoundly believe that new trends and revolution in information gathering has brought imperatively exceeding effects on individuals as well as whole society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-10 | bita_harzandi@yahoo.com | 85 | view |
| 2019-06-09 | nimmyjis | 88 | view |
| 2019-02-01 | vijay_iwillget79 | 85 | view |
| 2018-08-13 | radhik | 77 | view |
| 2018-06-09 | umme zaid | 88 | view |
- team sports are generally prompted as a great way to keep fit and build character. However, sporting events such as soccer matches are often accompanied by violence between the rival supporters and other form of antisocial behavior. If sporting events can 88
- Communication has evolved significantly in the last decade. Discuss pros and cons impacts. 80
- Should discrimination against older workers be made illegal? 55
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.Choose which position you most agr 88
- Some people think law changes human behavior. Do you agree or disagree? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y, media communication implicitly impact individuals, such issue is regarded thor...
^^
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t, the improvement in mass communication can provide society with some noticeable...
^^
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tal aspects of information through media relates to this reality that the demerit...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, in contrast, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 31.9359605911 150% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 5.75862068966 313% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 294.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58843537415 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24133241548 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.5024630542 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.788635611 50.4703680194 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.3 104.977214359 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4 20.9669160288 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.7 7.25397266985 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194201381249 0.242375264174 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677855200752 0.0925447433944 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497659350171 0.071462118173 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114705865434 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330015368819 0.0609392437508 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 12.6369458128 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.12 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 10.9458128079 155% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.3980295567 131% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.