Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid.
Many politicians argue that financial support is the best way to solve the poor condition in developing countries. However, this method is not always effective and various of commentators suggest other solutions. I partially agree with this idea because I strongly believe that different poor nations are suitable for different tactics.
The rich nation may not understand the poor nations' problems as thoroughly as the indigenous people do. As a consequence, providing developing countries with money can help them alleviate their problems by their own way. For instance, in 2000, the USA supported Laos financially to improve the country agriculture, but Laos had to find out the most feasible solution itself. Surprisingly, the result was outstanding as Laos national agricultural system could feed its all population afterwards. Furthermore, there are an abundance of factors that contribute to poverty. Therefore, another benefit of financial aid is that poor countries can use the money to solve different problems.
Despite the strong arguments above, I have to admit that there are other ways to eradicate the problem. The first preventative solution is to provide poor nations with what they do not have or not have enough. This solution is proven to be highly effective in some situations as urgent as nationwide starvation . For example, during the 1990s food crisis, Cambodia was given food and agricultural products by England. Another plausible solution is that rich countries pass some legislations, such as lower taxation, in order to help poor ones with their economy.
In conclusion, even though financial support from developed countries can help poor nations alleviate poverty themselves. Besides, providing the products that they are lacking in is a suitable solution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 465, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...national agricultural system could feed its all population afterwards. Furthermore,...
^^^
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...tions as urgent as nationwide starvation . For example, during the 1990s food cris...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49819494585 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93334902708 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592057761733 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.3930359601 49.4020404114 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.1875 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3125 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247055803821 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770496884062 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0851423367704 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148998747352 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598259298287 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.