The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people's efficiency so that they have more leisure time.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The discovery of the fire has lead human race to an unimaginable world full of more discoveries and inventions. Science has made the impossible things possible, dreams into reality and barren lands to countries like the USA. Technological inventions have made human race open to new possibilities. Technological inventions based on scientific discoveries have made the world glow in the dark, to see other universes and to know the miracles a human brain can perform. Even though one can give credits incredible thinking a human brain can do, technological advancements have compounded with the thinking power of human in a positive manner to such great outcomes. It is difficult to imagine today's world without an hour of electricity and impossible to even try to survive using only fire and wheels as our ancestors have done. From the time of creation of fire, the primitive purpose of any technological invention was to reduce human labor works.
The primitive motive behind developing technology is to reduce cumbersome human labor work. Tiresome unhelpful repetitive labor work only leads to unproductivity. If smartphones were not invented, then a businessman cannot roam the world to see new business opportunities without stopping working. Technology gives open access to connectivity and mobility which are basic needs for companies and corporations to stand in the market. The technology eliminates any chances for errors which humans are prone to cause. It is infallible. It saves humans time to rectify unnecessary caused errors by other humans.
Technology helps man to give him time to spend for which he is made to i.e. think. Technology should perform the iterative tasks which don't lead to any insights but boredom and exertion. Factory workers can produce more products than before using machines once they understand how to operate them.
Using technology, people should get time to think on methods to improve the existing technologies, find better solutions to global issues, to think on higher meaning of life, to live a better human life. Knowledge is Power only when people with knowledge gets time to apply, develop and work on it to create something. If people were still spending their time to walk from their home to offices daily, there would not be any time left for spending with family, building stronger connections and giving oneself time to introspect and improve.
Technology will be boon to human civilization only if it helps human to get a better life by
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-21 | mflzzz | 54 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | mflzzz | 54 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | seonjungkim | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | seonjungkim | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | seonjungkim | 66 | view |
- The following appeared as an editorial in the student newspaper of Groveton College."To combat the recently reported dramatic rise in cheating among college students, colleges and universities should adopt honor codes similar to Groveton's, which calls fo 77
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner."Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central 79
- The data from a survey of high school math and science teachers show that in the district of Sanlee many of these teachers reported assigning daily homework, whereas in the district of Marlee, most science and math teachers reported assigning homework no 73
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and suppo 50
- It is more harmful to compromise one's own beliefs than to adhere to them.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 620, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive manner" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ounded with the thinking power of human in a positive manner to such great outcomes. It is difficult...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...hould perform the iterative tasks which dont lead to any insights but boredom and ex...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, then, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2101.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 405.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18765432099 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85584136534 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 687.6 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.8560289486 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.047619048 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.47619047619 5.21951772744 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170361555487 0.243740707755 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521797928901 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411617045397 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101310426707 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394686565359 0.0667264976115 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.