The maps below illustrate hơ Frenton changed from 1990 to 2012
The two given maps show a large discrepancy of Frenton over the period of 22 years between 1990 and 2012.
Overall, it is noticeable that Frenton had modified considerably over the given period; which had more buildings instead of trees.
In 1990, playing fields with trees was constructed belong to the high street, nevertheless, it was vanished to make way for blocks of flats. Moreover, a variety of trees were chopped down in order to replaced techno park in 2012. In addition, the bank were devastated to rebuilt a high end restaurant at that time. However, the school and the library were still remained over the 22-year period, regardless of vast modifications. Regarding the hospital, there was a tremendous innovation, which was converted into humongous building.
In 2012, flats were built next to high street. Additionally, cafe and park was demolished to reconstructed hotel and golf courses, meanwhile, threater was modernised in order to become a state of art cinema. Whereas, houses were developed into some blocks of flats, at the same time, shops were altered to relocated supermarket.
- Leaders and directors in an organisation are normally older people Some people think younger leader would be better Do you agree or disagree 87
- The best way to resolve the international enviromental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some people believe that population explosion is not a serious problem because the world has enough resources to support this issue. 78
- the pie chart below show units of electricity production by fuel source in australia and france in 1980 and 2000. 73
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make the comparisons where relevant. 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, still, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18994413408 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86007331203 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653631284916 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.390788078 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.9 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 5.23603664747 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106479231343 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045466799202 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694563283264 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0879070678143 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.086890274796 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.