The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010
The maps illustrate the development of road around city hospital for three years since 2007. It is immediately apparent that there are the significant alterations in terms of amenities and infrastructure during this period.
Regarding the year of 2007, it is clearly seen that city hospital –in the north area– was surrounded by ring road which was integrated to city road by means of hospital road having three couples of bus stops along the way. Following this, there was car park which was addressed to public and hospital’s employee.
Subsequently, three years later, the infrastructure experienced a considerable development in form of the road. There were two roundabouts located on each side of hospital road –connecting ring road and city road. In addition, all bus stops were removed and were replaced by bus station placed to the west of hospital road and linked with two roundabouts. The last alteration occurred in the car park that was divided to be two part; car park for staff and car park for the public. While the former is situated in the initial place –to the eastern hospital road–, the latter is put behind the ring road and to the west of hospital road.
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- The table below shows the information about the underground railway system in six cities. 56
- Personal Statement 40
- The bar chart below shows information about water use worldwide (Km3) from three different sectors between 1910 and 2010. 84
- The diagrams below give information about the Eiffel Tower in Paris and an outline project to extend it underground 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 997.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.985 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83230912861 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3910436646 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.777777778 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317326857269 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143860198175 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113499566447 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223582050005 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0176256411096 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.